Evaluation of 3D stack-of-spiral turbo FLASH acquisitions for pseudo-continuous and velocity-selective ASL-derived brain perfusion mapping.

PURPOSE: The most-used 3D acquisitions for ASL are gradient and spin echo (GRASE)- and stack-of-spiral (SOS)-based fast spin echo, which require multiple shots. Alternatively, turbo FLASH (TFL) allows longer echo trains, and SOS-TFL has the potential to reduce the number of shots to even single-shot, thus improving the temporal resolution. Here we compare the performance of 3D SOS-TFL and 3D GRASE for ASL at 3T. METHODS: The 3D SOS-TFL readout was optimized with respect to fat suppression and excitation flip angles for pseudo-continuous ASL- and velocity-selective (VS)ASL-derived cerebral blood flow (CBF) mapping as well as for VSASL-derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping. Results were compared with 3D GRASE readout on healthy volunteers in terms of perfusion quantification and temporal SNR (tSNR) efficiency. CBF and CBV mapping derived from 3D SOS-TFL-based ASL was demonstrated on one stroke patient, and the potential for single-shot acquisitions was exemplified. RESULTS: SOS-TFL with a 15° flip angle resulted in adequate tSNR efficiency with negligible image blurring. Selective water excitation was necessary to eliminate fat-induced artifacts. For pseudo-continuous ASL- and VSASL-based CBF and CBV mapping, compared to the employed four-shot 3D GRASE with an acceleration factor of 2, the fully sampled 3D SOS-TFL delivered comparable performance (with a similar scan time) using three shots, which could be further undersampled to achieve single-shot acquisition with higher tSNR efficiency. SOS-TFL had reduced CSF contamination for VSASL-CBF. CONCLUSION: 3D SOS-TFL acquisition was found to be a viable substitute for 3D GRASE for ASL with sufficient tSNR efficiency, minimal relaxation-induced blurring, reduced CSF contamination, and the potential of single-shot, especially for VSASL.

Advanced Brain Age and Chronic Poststroke Aphasia Severity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic poststroke language impairment is typically worse in older individuals or those with large stroke lesions. However, there is unexplained variance that likely depends on intact tissue beyond the lesion. Brain age is an emerging concept, which is partially independent from chronologic age. Advanced brain age is associated with cognitive decline in healthy older adults; therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship with stroke aphasia. We hypothesized that advanced brain age is a significant factor associated with chronic poststroke language impairments, above and beyond chronologic age, and lesion characteristics. METHODS: This cohort study retrospectively evaluated participants from the Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia clinical trial (NCT03416738), recruited through local advertisement in South Carolina (US). Primary inclusion criteria were left hemisphere stroke and chronic aphasia (≥12 months after stroke). Participants completed baseline behavioral testing including the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R), Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT), Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT), and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Matrices subtest, before completing 6 weeks of language therapy. The PNT was repeated 1 month after therapy. We leveraged modern neuroimaging techniques to estimate brain age and computed a proportional difference between chronologic age and estimated brain age. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between proportional brain age difference (PBAD) and behavior. RESULTS: Participants (N = 93, 58 males and 35 females, average age = 61 years) had estimated brain ages ranging from 14 years younger to 23 years older than chronologic age. Advanced brain age predicted performance on semantic tasks (PPTT) and language tasks (WAB-R). For participants with advanced brain aging (n = 47), treatment gains (improvement on the PNT) were independently predicted by PBAD (T = -2.0474, p = 0.0468, 9% of variance explained). DISCUSSION: Through the application of modern neuroimaging techniques, advanced brain aging was associated with aphasia severity and performance on semantic tasks. Notably, therapy outcome scores were also associated with PBAD, albeit only among participants with advanced brain aging. These findings corroborate the importance of brain age as a determinant of poststroke recovery and underscore the importance of personalized health factors in determining recovery trajectories, which should be considered during the planning or implementation of therapeutic interventions.

Association of Regional Atrophy With Naming Decline in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative condition that predominantly impairs language. Most investigations of how focal atrophy affects language consider 1 time point compared with healthy controls. However, true atrophy quantification requires comparing individual brains over time. In this observational cohort study, we identified areas where focal atrophy was associated with contemporaneous decline in naming in the same individuals. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses-related Boston Naming Test (BNT) performance and volume in 22 regions of interests (ROIs) at each time point using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Longitudinal analysis evaluated changes in BNT performance and change in volume in the same ROIs. RESULTS: Participants (N = 62; 50% female; mean age = 66.8 ± 7.4 years) with PPA completed the BNT and MRI twice (mean = 343.9 ± 209.0 days apart). In cross-sectional left inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis, superior temporal pole, middle temporal gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus were identified as critical for naming at all time points. Longitudinal analysis revealed that increasing atrophy in the left supramarginal gyrus and middle temporal pole predicted greater naming decline, as did female sex and longer intervals between time points. DISCUSSION: Although cross-sectional analyses identified classic language areas that were consistently related to poor performance at multiple time points, it was not increasing atrophy in these areas that lead to further decline: longitudinal analysis of each person's atrophy over time instead identified nearby but distinct regions where increased atrophy was related to decreasing performance. The results demonstrate that directly examining atrophy (in each individual) over time furthers understanding of decline in PPA and reveal the importance of left supramarginal gyrus and middle temporal pole in maintaining naming when areas normally critical for language degenerate. The novel results provide insight into how the underlying disease progresses to result in the clinical decline in naming, the deficit most common among all 3 PPA variants.

Enhanced Imaging and Language Assessments for Primary Progressive Aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is widely agreed that primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome with at least 3 distinct variants that differ in phenotype, areas of atrophy, and most common underlying neurodegenerative disease. The distinction between logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) and other variants is important for prognosis and medical management. However, differentiating logopenic from nonfluent agrammatic variant can be difficult. We aimed to identify a novel behavioral assessment that (1) distinguishes logopenic from the other variants with a high degree of accuracy and (2) correlates with left superior temporal-inferior parietal atrophy (previously shown to be associated with this variant). The location of atrophy was measured using a novel, clinically useful imaging analysis. METHODS: In this observational cohort study of 227 individuals with PPA, participants were administered sentence reading and repetition subtests from a standard battery. A subset of 41 participants were administered enhanced reading and repetition subtests with 5 longer sentences, of which 13 had brain imaging. Ratios of word-level and sentence-level accuracy in reading:repetition were calculated. We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether either or both ratios of reading:repetition independently discriminated between variants and t test to determine whether the ratios distinguished between nonfluent and logopenic variants. We identified receiver operating characteristics and Pearson correlations between the reading:repetition ratios and ratio of left:right superior temporal-inferior parietal volume. RESULTS: The sentence reading:repetition ratio using the new stimuli significantly differed across the 3 variants (p < 0.00001) and differed between nonfluent and logopenic variants (t(27) = 4.1; p = 0.0003). The area under the curve for distinguishing logopenic from other variants was 0.85 (0.71-0.99), and the diagnostic accuracy was 87.5%. The sentence reading:repetition ratio correlated with left:right superior temporal-inferior parietal volume (r = 0.69; p = 0.0087), but not with left:right volume of regions of interest associated with other variants. DISCUSSION: Results provide an efficient and reliable clinical assessment, and a novel imaging analysis, to distinguish the clinical syndrome of logopenic variant from other variants of PPA. Results also support the proposal that lvPPA reflects a defect in phonological short-term memory caused by atrophy in the superior temporal-inferior parietal cortex. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that the sentence reading:repetition ratio distinguished logopenic PPA from other PPA variants.

Pearls & Oy-sters: Cerebral Venous Congestion Associated With Cognitive Decline Treated by Jugular Release.

Cognitive dysfunction is often multifaceted and can be seen across all age groups in medicine. The combination of cognitive decline and increased intracranial pressure may suggest possible anatomical abnormalities. We present a case report from our academic center that describes a young man with new cognitive fatigue and brain fog in the setting of increased venous pressure that resolved with surgical intervention at a site of jugular vein stenosis. We discuss current hypotheses from basic and clinical research related to pathophysiology underlying venous vascular congestion and associated neurologic disorders. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of venous congestion and cognition to better identify therapies and improve quality of life for patients.

Disruptions of the Human Connectome Associated With Hemispatial Neglect.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hemispatial neglect is a heterogeneous and complex disorder that can be classified by frame of reference for "left" vs "right," including viewer-centered neglect (VCN, affecting the contralesional side of the view), stimulus-centered neglect (SCN, affecting the contralesional side of the stimulus, irrespective of its location with respect to the viewer), or both. We investigated the effect of acute stroke lesions on the connectivity of neural networks that underlie VCN or SCN. METHODS: A total of 174 patients within 48 hours of acute right hemispheric infarct underwent a detailed hemispatial neglect assessment that included oral reading, scene copy, line cancellation, gap detection, horizontal line bisection tests, and MRI. Each patient's connectivity map was generated. We performed a linear association analysis between network connectivity strength and continuous measures of neglect to identify lesion-induced disconnections associated with the presence or severity of VCN and SCN. Results were corrected for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: About 42% of the participants with right hemisphere stroke had at least one type of neglect. The presence of any type of neglect was associated with lesions to tracts connecting the right inferior parietal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and right thalamus to other right-hemispheric structures. VCN only was strongly associated with tracts connecting the right putamen to other brain regions and tracts connecting right frontal regions with other brain regions. The presence of both types of neglect was most strongly associated with tracts connecting the right inferior and superior parietal cortex to other brain regions and those connecting left or right mesial temporal cortex to other brain regions. DISCUSSION: Our study provides new evidence for the specific white matter tracts where disruption can cause hemispatial neglect in a relatively large number of participants and homogeneous time after onset. We obtained MRI and behavioral testing acutely, before the opportunity for rehabilitation or substantial recovery. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that damage to specific white matter tracts identified on MRI are associated with the presence of neglect following right hemispheric stroke.

Sign language aphasia.

Signed languages are naturally occurring, fully formed linguistic systems that rely on the movement of the hands, arms, torso, and face within a sign space for production, and are perceived predominantly using visual perception. Despite stark differences in modality and linguistic structure, functional neural organization is strikingly similar to spoken language. Generally speaking, left frontal areas support sign production, and regions in the auditory cortex underlie sign comprehension-despite signers not relying on audition to process language. Given this, should a deaf or hearing signer suffer damage to the left cerebral hemisphere, language is vulnerable to impairment. Multiple cases of sign language aphasia have been documented following left hemisphere injury, and the general pattern of linguistic deficits mirrors those observed in spoken language. The right hemisphere likely plays a role in non-linguistic but critical visuospatial functions of sign language; therefore, individuals who are spared from damage to the left hemisphere but suffer injury to the right are at risk for a different set of communication deficits. In this chapter, we review the neurobiology of sign language and patterns of language deficits that follow brain injury in the deaf signing population.

Vascular syndromes: Revisiting classification of poststroke aphasia.

Over 150 years have passed since the first formal description of aphasia associated with localized neurologic damage. In the years since that time, a significant amount of research has been conducted to identify/explain the locations and functions of the brain regions responsible for (or associated with) language as well as to describe the various types of aphasia resulting from injury to these locations. Many of these attempts to associate somewhat predictable patterns of language deficits with damage to specific structures have been confounded by atypical reports and considerable variability in either the behavioral presentation and/or structural damage that directly contradict/oppose some of the proposed theories. However, considering the aphasias as vascular syndromes, or a collection of symptoms associated with damage to various structures supplied by a specific artery, accounts for both the predictability and the variability seen. This chapter presents a brief history of aphasia classification, the vascular territories commonly associated with aphasia, the different aphasic vascular syndromes, and the typical recovery/evolution of aphasia presentation over time.

Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia.

Aphasia, impairment of language after stroke or other neurological insult, is a common and often devastating condition that affects nearly every social activity and interaction. Behavioral speech and language therapy is the mainstay of treatment, although other interventions have been introduced to augment the effects of the behavioral therapy. In this narrative review, we discuss advances in aphasia therapy in the last 5 years and focus primarily on properly powered, randomized, controlled trials of both behavioral therapies and interventions to augment therapy for post-stroke aphasia. These trials include evaluation of behavioral therapies and computer-delivered language therapies. We also discuss outcome prediction trials as well as interventional trials that have employed noninvasive brain stimulation, or medications to augment language therapy. Supported by evidence from Phase III trials and large meta-analyses, it is now generally accepted that aphasia therapy can improve language processing for many patients. Not all patients respond similarly to aphasia therapy with the most severe patients being the least likely responders. Nevertheless, it is imperative that all patients, regardless of severity, receive aphasia management focused on direct therapy of language deficits, counseling, or both. Emerging evidence from Phase II trials suggests transcranial brain stimulation is a promising method to boost aphasia therapy outcomes.